Generative AI (GenAI) has transformed industries by enabling innovative applications, including text generation, content creation, image synthesis, and natural language processing. However, the success of GenAI models heavily depends on the quality, integrity, and management of the data on which they are trained. As organizations harness the power of GenAI, the importance of robust data governance solutions cannot be overstated. This compendium highlights unique challenges and risks associated with how GenAI models are developed, deployed, and used, and why data governance is essential for successful GenAI implementations.
Challenges to Enterprise-Wide GenAI Adoption
GenAI has made significant strides, but it faces several key challenges across technical, ethical, and societal dimensions. Below are some foundational barriers to enterprise-wide GenAI adoption:
1. Bias and Fairness: GenAI models can unintentionally perpetuate or amplify biases present in their training data, leading to unfair or harmful outputs, particularly in sensitive areas such as hiring, criminal justice, and healthcare.
2. Data Privacy and Security Controls: GenAI systems often require vast amounts of data, raising concerns about privacy and the potential for misuse of personal or proprietary information. Poor handling of data privacy can lead to security breaches, violating regulations such as GDPR, and creating mistrust among users and regulators.
3. Interpretability and Explainability: Many GenAI models, especially large language models, are often seen as "black boxes," where the reasoning behind their outputs is opaque and difficult to explain. Lack of explainability weakens trust in AI systems, particularly in regulated industries that require accountability and transparency.
4. Whimsical Output or Data Hallucination: GenAI models can produce fabricated or inaccurate information, known as "hallucinations," particularly when they attempt to answer questions outside their training data. This raises concerns when such outputs are taken as factual, leading to the spread of misinformation or harm in high-stakes domains such as medicine or law.